33 Comments
User's avatar
Tom Fuget's avatar

They are armed to disarm you! Just incase you don't comply.

Expand full comment
Liz's avatar

You are absolutely amazing. I so admure and am so grateful for your work.

Expand full comment
Markus's avatar

To me the main focus of Congress should be to guarantee the new CBDC can never be used to control the population. The IRS won't need any guns if the weapon of choice is the CBDC. Right now the IRS and other pencil pushing agencies need the guns to control us, but in the future our money will simply be turned off as a way to control us.

We, and Congress, need to focus on the real threat before it's too late!

Expand full comment
Sandra Long's avatar

Thank you for doing a great job.

Expand full comment
American's avatar

How can a militarized politicized IRS end well for American citizens?

Expand full comment
Oscar's avatar

The GOP should hammer the truth about the militarization of federal agencies

all the way to 2024. This is an outrageous attack on American citizens, who are

PAYING for their govt being turned on them. This is a winning election issue.

Expand full comment
John Gerty's avatar

Now we know why Adam stays so busy.

Expand full comment
Blaise's avatar

Maybe the IRS needs this for a visit to Hunter?

Oh wait. Sorry. Rules only apply to us - as Leona Helmsley once said - little people

Expand full comment
HardeeHo's avatar

Once upon a time, a President wanted ammunition shortages so he asked agencies to buy it all up. So they did. All of a sudden they needed to justify buying all that stuff, so they did. They even asked the military to stop selling old brass used at firing ranges, instead melting it down as scrap. All to reduce the ability of citizens to accumulate ammunition. Didn't work but did get some short term shortages.

Now we find the agencies in self perpetuation of arming themselves. And all that stuff has on-going costs of storage and maintenance. Do they really need that stuff? Congress ought to be asking.

Expand full comment
Not a commie pinko's avatar

Im sure they will visit you tomorrow

(Of course you shouldn’t worry, I’m sure they need millions of rounds of ammunition just to target shoot on Saturdays)

Never defend the indefensible. The facts are printed in this site. If you can’t figure that out, sorry.

Expand full comment
STRAWMAN's avatar

Because of "Posse Commitatus" (sp?) The military can't attack us on US soil. But Federal domestic agencies are not covered by this law, apparently. Go on the offensive: unvolunteer for the income tax. For 20 years, thousands have done this w/o one non-taxpayer being charged with a crime. Go to: losthorizons.com to get lots of free info on the what, why and how of it.

Expand full comment
Tommy L Hoffman's avatar

PREPARE FOR A NATIONAL STRIKE

Expand full comment
TheArtistFormerlyKnownAs. . .'s avatar

I would add to this the inexplicable & disturbing stockpiling of hollow point bullets across a range of Federal agencies (Obama years especially, but bipartisan). Hollow point bullets are ILLEGAL to use in military warfare under international law because of their extraordinary lethality. If they cannot be used against foreign enemies in combat, that leaves only us.

The majority of Americans shrug such signs off, do not ask themselves nor their political representatives what the purpose is, nor do they demand de-funding of such abuse of our tax dollars.

Expand full comment
MM's avatar

Hollowpoints also cost a lot more - if these rounds are just for training, why not save $$$ and just get FMJ?

Expand full comment
Not a commie pinko's avatar

They’re getting ready to roger stone or Waco you is why. Look at these alphabet agencies with all this military gear. It’s incredible in the worst way.

Expand full comment
Not a commie pinko's avatar

The problem with this situation is that at least 60% of the population is already communist/so called socialist and they don’t care what happens if they can disarm you. As the older generation dies out, these communist will represent all but a tiny part of the American public. At that point, or before, the Chinese along with Putin or his replacement will attack us and eliminate the threat in short order. I don’t see a way to turn this around. Don’t worry about the money as some here focus on, it’s about control. Yes king Obama got the ball rolling. The swamp is enormous. They can already crush you, and will.

Expand full comment
John Gerty's avatar

You are complaining about IRS agents, who have law enforcement responsibilities, costing taxpayers $16,700.00 per agent, over a 13 year period? Got it. All the while we have a tax system which advantages wealthy real estate developers and hedge funds. Plus I see some of your commenters still referring to King Obama.

Expand full comment
MM's avatar

Bad example - RE developers and investment trusts are losing a ton of $$ with the ongoing residental housing & CRE correction.

The average salary at the Federal Reserve, on the other hand, is nearly $200k/yr.

Expand full comment
John Gerty's avatar

According to Zippia the average employee at Federal Reserve makes $91,007.00. They also employ 2100 people.

Citing a dearth of profits in a declining market is also slanting the overall picture.

https://www.zippia.com/federal-reserve-system-careers-57346/#

Expand full comment
MM's avatar

Looks like we're both wrong - I got my data directly from the Fed's Annual Report, but my almost 200K figure is for salaries *and benefits* i.e. insurance, vacation etc. The Fed does not break down salaries *minus benefits* unfortunately.

In the Fed's annual report, scroll down to Page 166, Table D.10: you'll see annual Salaries & Benefits for the Federal Reserve banks listed as $3.8 Trillion.

Then scroll down to Table D.11 on the next page; total headcount for the entire Federal Reserve System is 20,470 employees.

$3.8 trillion / 20470 = an average taxpayer cost per employee of $185K/year.

Feel free to check my numbers: https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/2021-annual-report.pdf

Expand full comment
Not a commie pinko's avatar

I’m not sure what a tax collector needs other than a computer to attach your bank account. I guess they will pull a roger stone on you at 5:00 am if you deduct too much on your last business dinner. Law enforcement function? I’m sure you want these idiots showing up at your house. 87,000 billionaires, no. They will be at your house soon. Don’t think these guys won’t go after your family. All you have to be is on the wrong side of some argument with the government and they will be on you. Plenty of the alphabet agencies already just waiting to pounce on someone and ruin their life. Everyone should be scared.

Expand full comment
John Gerty's avatar

So when was the last time you saw a report of jackbooted IRS agents raiding some taxpayer's, or suspected tax cheater's house?

Expand full comment
Tommy L Hoffman's avatar

Why all the weapons and new personnel.

Expand full comment
John Gerty's avatar

Try to get past your weapons paranoia. Try thinking about the budget deficits and how tax cheats are costing all of us money.. Then understand the IRS is the department which will go after those people and businesses.

https://taxfoundation.org/irs-budget-increase-technology/

Expand full comment
Molon's avatar

so... The IRS is going to close the budget deficit by cutting down on tax cheats? No.

Expand full comment
Not a commie pinko's avatar

So they can target shoot with John Gerty ? Gummit guy

Expand full comment
Not a commie pinko's avatar

Yes. The point is control. Not taxes. Never was. If you think it’s trumps fault think again. It’s Ryan, McConnell et al, with Rand Paul being the exception. Of course every democrat as well. That’s a socialist position, so they will all vote to disarm you

Expand full comment
cat's avatar

Um, it's not the COST that bothers us. Got it????

Expand full comment
Charles-Louis Labianco's avatar

"We reserve the right to remove comments that deemed offensive to our organization, staff, and audience." That is un-constitutional. BETTER SO HAVE A POLICY WHICH STATES: All arguments against the personalities of our people and of our organization will be rejected, removed from the comments. All logical arguments will be sustained. " I HAVE A LOT OF RESPECT FOR Mr. Andrzejewski and his organization. But, not to allow criticism? That is against my philosophy of dealing with truth and falsity in the comments. Of course, "comments against the organization" such as "communistic", "fascists", etc. are not logical arguments unless explained. Then if factual and definitional and logically valid, then such should be allowed and your organization, if it is to be held in high esteem. Then of course, should answer those such arguments in print and publish it widely.

Re: the Armed IRS Agents: The IRS is a private company under contract with the "federal government" to collect taxes owed to the private banking cartel, a.k.a. The Federal Reserve Bank. THE ARMED AGENTS ARE THEREFORE POLICE OF A FOREIGN CORPORATION WHO ARE OPERATING WITHING OUT LEGAL SYSTEM? HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE CONSIDERING OUR "SOVEREIGNTY". IF WE ARE SOVEREIGN AS A NATION, THEN IT IS NOT POSSIBLE. IF WE ARE NOT SOVEREIGN AS A NATION, ON THIS TAX SUBJECT, THEN IT IS POSSIBLE. CONSLUSION: IT IS HAPPENING. THEREFORE, WE ARE NOT SOVEREIGN ON THE TAX SUBJECT. IF I AM CORRECT OR NOT, THE COURT OF LOGIC REQUIRES THAT HONEST TRUTH TELLERS REPLY TO MY COMMENTS. WHAT SAY YOU NOW?

Expand full comment
Steve C's avatar

King Obama’s armed tax collectors. This is a dangerous and audacious act. Can they form a King’s army without constitutional authority and the Will of the population? Can they impose this terrible, traitorous act against free people, right under their noses? They hold us all in utter contempt. They want a civil war. What they should receive is a fully neutered leadership and elite class.

Expand full comment