33 Comments

They are armed to disarm you! Just incase you don't comply.

Expand full comment

You are absolutely amazing. I so admure and am so grateful for your work.

Expand full comment

To me the main focus of Congress should be to guarantee the new CBDC can never be used to control the population. The IRS won't need any guns if the weapon of choice is the CBDC. Right now the IRS and other pencil pushing agencies need the guns to control us, but in the future our money will simply be turned off as a way to control us.

We, and Congress, need to focus on the real threat before it's too late!

Expand full comment

Thank you for doing a great job.

Expand full comment

How can a militarized politicized IRS end well for American citizens?

Expand full comment

The GOP should hammer the truth about the militarization of federal agencies

all the way to 2024. This is an outrageous attack on American citizens, who are

PAYING for their govt being turned on them. This is a winning election issue.

Expand full comment

Now we know why Adam stays so busy.

Expand full comment

Maybe the IRS needs this for a visit to Hunter?

Oh wait. Sorry. Rules only apply to us - as Leona Helmsley once said - little people

Expand full comment

Once upon a time, a President wanted ammunition shortages so he asked agencies to buy it all up. So they did. All of a sudden they needed to justify buying all that stuff, so they did. They even asked the military to stop selling old brass used at firing ranges, instead melting it down as scrap. All to reduce the ability of citizens to accumulate ammunition. Didn't work but did get some short term shortages.

Now we find the agencies in self perpetuation of arming themselves. And all that stuff has on-going costs of storage and maintenance. Do they really need that stuff? Congress ought to be asking.

Expand full comment
May 2, 2023·edited May 2, 2023

Im sure they will visit you tomorrow

(Of course you shouldn’t worry, I’m sure they need millions of rounds of ammunition just to target shoot on Saturdays)

Never defend the indefensible. The facts are printed in this site. If you can’t figure that out, sorry.

Expand full comment

Because of "Posse Commitatus" (sp?) The military can't attack us on US soil. But Federal domestic agencies are not covered by this law, apparently. Go on the offensive: unvolunteer for the income tax. For 20 years, thousands have done this w/o one non-taxpayer being charged with a crime. Go to: losthorizons.com to get lots of free info on the what, why and how of it.

Expand full comment

I would add to this the inexplicable & disturbing stockpiling of hollow point bullets across a range of Federal agencies (Obama years especially, but bipartisan). Hollow point bullets are ILLEGAL to use in military warfare under international law because of their extraordinary lethality. If they cannot be used against foreign enemies in combat, that leaves only us.

The majority of Americans shrug such signs off, do not ask themselves nor their political representatives what the purpose is, nor do they demand de-funding of such abuse of our tax dollars.

Expand full comment
May 1, 2023·edited May 1, 2023

The problem with this situation is that at least 60% of the population is already communist/so called socialist and they don’t care what happens if they can disarm you. As the older generation dies out, these communist will represent all but a tiny part of the American public. At that point, or before, the Chinese along with Putin or his replacement will attack us and eliminate the threat in short order. I don’t see a way to turn this around. Don’t worry about the money as some here focus on, it’s about control. Yes king Obama got the ball rolling. The swamp is enormous. They can already crush you, and will.

Expand full comment

You are complaining about IRS agents, who have law enforcement responsibilities, costing taxpayers $16,700.00 per agent, over a 13 year period? Got it. All the while we have a tax system which advantages wealthy real estate developers and hedge funds. Plus I see some of your commenters still referring to King Obama.

Expand full comment

"We reserve the right to remove comments that deemed offensive to our organization, staff, and audience." That is un-constitutional. BETTER SO HAVE A POLICY WHICH STATES: All arguments against the personalities of our people and of our organization will be rejected, removed from the comments. All logical arguments will be sustained. " I HAVE A LOT OF RESPECT FOR Mr. Andrzejewski and his organization. But, not to allow criticism? That is against my philosophy of dealing with truth and falsity in the comments. Of course, "comments against the organization" such as "communistic", "fascists", etc. are not logical arguments unless explained. Then if factual and definitional and logically valid, then such should be allowed and your organization, if it is to be held in high esteem. Then of course, should answer those such arguments in print and publish it widely.

Re: the Armed IRS Agents: The IRS is a private company under contract with the "federal government" to collect taxes owed to the private banking cartel, a.k.a. The Federal Reserve Bank. THE ARMED AGENTS ARE THEREFORE POLICE OF A FOREIGN CORPORATION WHO ARE OPERATING WITHING OUT LEGAL SYSTEM? HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE CONSIDERING OUR "SOVEREIGNTY". IF WE ARE SOVEREIGN AS A NATION, THEN IT IS NOT POSSIBLE. IF WE ARE NOT SOVEREIGN AS A NATION, ON THIS TAX SUBJECT, THEN IT IS POSSIBLE. CONSLUSION: IT IS HAPPENING. THEREFORE, WE ARE NOT SOVEREIGN ON THE TAX SUBJECT. IF I AM CORRECT OR NOT, THE COURT OF LOGIC REQUIRES THAT HONEST TRUTH TELLERS REPLY TO MY COMMENTS. WHAT SAY YOU NOW?

Expand full comment

King Obama’s armed tax collectors. This is a dangerous and audacious act. Can they form a King’s army without constitutional authority and the Will of the population? Can they impose this terrible, traitorous act against free people, right under their noses? They hold us all in utter contempt. They want a civil war. What they should receive is a fully neutered leadership and elite class.

Expand full comment