5 Comments
User's avatar
Aladdin Sane's avatar

A problem with funding for government agencies is that if you don’t spend your whole budget you will get penalized for it so there is this perverse incentive to be wasteful. I have always thought that there should be some kind of incentive for government agencies to try and save money. I don’t know how it could work but wish someone smarter than me will figure it out. I was also thinking about how many administrations have attempted to make a dent in this area but were simply overwhelmed by the scope and complexity of the problem. Enter AI and some smart young whippersnappers. Also I would like to say, God bless Elon Musk. He is taking a big hit for the American people and I appreciate it. Thanks for the article.

HardeeHo's avatar

Amazing piece of work may help DOGE. Employee count steady yet spending increased. A lot of $$ going somewhere with less oversight.

Carolyn Copp's avatar

Glad to see data! Good and valuable work. Could Outlays be adjusted for inflation if they haven't been? Thank you.

Ted's avatar

Interesting. First impression is that the current headcount reductions may prove to be effective as cost reduction, if those who are incompetent or politically-motivated in the way they handle private-sector contracts, are replaced.

The money trail reveals that what is most closely related to what we conceptualize as money "laundering," appears to be inter-agency funding transfers.

Ruth H's avatar

Amazing work by Open the Books. The fund outlays by these agencies by enormous increases under Biden administration show even more corruption and waste. The last four years has cost us trillions of wasteful spending on top of our already high debt. 🤬🤬