Discussion about this post

User's avatar
PAUL L HARFORD's avatar

James Bryson hit the nail on the proverbial head. The misuse of technology or the corrupt applications it fosters is pretty scary. What a conundrum.

Lumpy Moobs's avatar

One thing I keep thinking about is the parallel between this moment and the Industrial Revolution. Back then, it wasn’t just new machines that changed history – it was the labor movement, unions, mutual aid, and organized workers forcing a political and ethical framework onto raw industrial power. Without that push from below, industrial tech mostly meant a tiny group getting rich while everyone else got worked to death.

Feels like we’re in the same kind of hinge moment with AI. If AI is built and governed mainly by the usual “haves,” it’s going to supercharge the gap between the haves and have-nots. If it’s built with direct citizen involvement, it could actually redistribute power instead of concentrating it. So I’m curious how you see Aqueduct engaging regular people, not just policy pros and data nerds:

Do you envision Aqueduct being something local journalists, students, unions, and community orgs can actually use day to day, not just a dashboard for insiders?

Are there plans for citizen assemblies/labor groups/community orgs to help decide what Aqueduct should optimize for (waste reduction, equity, job impacts, long-term public value, etc.)?

How open will this be – code, models, or at least APIs – so civic hackers and grassroots orgs can build on top of it instead of just consuming a pre-packaged interface?

I really like the AlphaFold analogy(having recently watched the new documentary myself): pattern recognition at scale aimed at a public good. I’d just love to see Aqueduct explicitly acknowledge that, like the labor rights movement in the industrial era, we need organized, informed citizen power alongside AI tools. Otherwise, the tech will still mostly serve whoever already has the most leverage and lawyers.

Curious to hear more about how you’re thinking about that dimension of Aqueduct – governance, participation, and keeping this from becoming freedom, but only for those who can afford a data team. Kinda like freedom of the press was only for those who can afford a press. 🤪

13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?